With his "personal opinion" is now a local politician in the NRZ Ossenberg Ossenberg to school talk to speak.
Hence a few quotes with answers:
Quote NRZ v. 19.3. "What has held the city of Rheinsberg in terms of primary school Ossenberg, had been decided transparent and lawful decisions (...). The Wallach and the school management in the higher education authorities have to accept it because they would comply with the law school. "
Parents' and Friends of this make fixed: parents, Parents' and Friends of the resolution in Ossenberg decision after law school have accepted very early on and supported constructive. The Parents' Ossenberg has agreed to this decision itself (though at that time under different conditions).
Quote NRZ v. 19.3. 'To oppose' "Decisions is everyone's perfect right, 'but do not obviously false factual basis and hiding the facts and the law. "
Answer: Within the contestable by anyone factual and legal - are meant here probably Demography and Education Act - there is room for the way in which dissolved the Catholic primary school Ossenberg and another school is connected . The criticism is directed not against the resolution Ossenberg decision, but against the one-sided against the Ossenberg site requirements and especially the catastrophic communications management by school management in Wallach, city administration and school supervision. have content, the "remaining critics" (O-tone of the critic-critic in the NRZ) always constructive argument (see the various substantive posts in this blog).
And if by "legal" the question is: Can confirm the school management in gelding with state-funded spaces of the all-day operation of schools, where the classrooms are not enough there and a branch in Ossenberg there would be enough room in the ?
Quote NRZ v. 19.3. "Council and administration had nothing to hide, there was no intrigue against the Ossenberg children."
Answer: No one has ever spoken of intrigue.
But we have obviously to do with ignorance, lack of care and lack of interest by the competent authorities (school in Wallach, school administration and school supervision), against the insecure parents and teachers and those which can deliver Ossenberg the all-day. And apparently it has forgotten how local politics in Rheinberg, that opposition to democratic politics, a belongs.
Quote NRZ v. 19.3. Get "carries such a thing anyway, which was devoid of any foundation, but is of the remaining critics of the school closure among parents and politicians enriched with emotional claims and diligently spread '. "
Answer: Supporters and Parents' have used that information to flow at all, to prevent rumors and parents to identify options for action . This would be really the job of others (hauptamtlicher!) Set been.
Quote NRZ v. 19.3. "Management and the Council had no alternative to the dissolution of the primary school in Ossenberg that already had to struggle for years with low numbers of applications would have. "
Answer: The debate, which should all log on to the word, is not it also deals, at all no more and no resolution or the issue, but with the design of the consequences of the resolution.
But this, too, that was not intervened early on controlling, is a failure of the administration and politics, its aftermath will now be played on the backs of those affected. Particularly in light of this omission is now a fair combination of the two sites Borth-Wallach and Ossenberg would be necessary.
For what Ossenberg has ever been established as a branch, if not used properly, but is instead in the school Wallach packed to the rafters?
Quote NRZ v. 19.3. "And the decision, the first school year with the Ossenberg fully accommodate children in lying Wallach, according to school law is the sole responsibility of the head teacher and have good organizational and pedagogical reasons. "
Answer: And we would like to get it explained again (in the hope that, the "good organizational and pedagogical reasons" for children at the school Ossenberg).
0 comments:
Post a Comment